• Kidd Barbour posted an update 5 months ago

    what’s webhard?

    Compared to the following clouds, media playback in mobile environments is advantageous. Especially in the case of videos, the next cloud needs to be downloaded all together, while streaming. Merely to stream! I need to install another app again. Cloud alone is not enough to stream.

    Faster compared to the next cloud. About 20%.

    Once you open a document with a cloud viewer, it breaks less than another cloud (but breaking itself has already been a problem).

    Web app is supported. It’s rudimentary, but it is possible to write. However, the thing is that the document format is a bizarre format, such as .ndoc, which makes it extremely incompatible.

    File sharing through the URL (but that is as far as another cloud is concerned).


    It includes a smaller capacity when compared to next cloud.

    Compared to foreign cloud services, it boasts poor service quality.

    Compared to the next cloud, it is extremely disadvantageous for music playback. Continuous streaming is possible only for several selected sound sources. The next cloud only has to be in a folder.

    You will need to share a URL and that means you can’t share music files or videos.

    According to the report, there is a saying that N drive looks like a local drive when installed, but only it happens like a local drive, which is no different from the folder synchronization setting. It’s a whole lot worse for computers in the first place when external programs play tricks on them. It’s far better to just clean up the synchronization folder.***

    It is very specialized in playing music. Specifically, it’s the only cloud that can play sound sources in an environment similar to MP3 players we are familiar with. Although each song has some buffering, it seems to play up to 192kpbs continuously, let’s assume that communication is in good shape in a 3G environment. Needless to say, in reality, it’s often cut off at that point)

    It includes a large capacity. This is a significant advantage when considering domestic cloud services all together, which have poor quality of media access in cloud services.

    You can substitute the finish drive above. In particular, if a picture is contained in a document, it really is rarely opened properly.

    Streaming songs often cuts off (but not often) due to communication problems with the cloud, not Internet speed problems. I feel like it’s about once every two hours. And if you pay attention to high-quality sound sources, it gets buffered often, or if you are in a place where the 3G environment isn’t smooth, it gets take off more often. So when it’s in that state, you will need to find the path of the folder where the song was playing and play it again.

    The only way to talk about is folder sharing. Only some documents or presentation files are available for file viewing. Except for those points, there is nothing to say even if it really is almost a webhard level.

    Foreign Cloud Comparison (Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, Skydrive)

    Google Drive

    It exerts tremendous power on paper documents. In particular, even lacking any office program, Google Drive can cover it somewhat. Not fancy ppts or fancy excels, nearly every simple document is OK.

    It is advantageous to reflect the progress of work in the mobile environment. By setting up only offline views, the files you focus on can continue being reflected in the cloud instantly. This is a very convenient feature for sharing files with other users.

    It is easy to connect to other Google services such as for example Gmail.

    If you don’t upload documents directly to the Google drive but write them on the Google drive web app, the capacity of the file will not take into account cloud storage (what can you mean, if you just use the web app, the capacity of the Google drive is infinite).

    Now, photo media access is strong at the dropbox level. You can flip through photos and videos can be played right away. However, the loading time seems to take a little longer compared to the dropbox. I feel it), nonetheless it doesn’t bother me.

    There are the most apps which might be connected. In a desktop environment. Various connection apps allow various operations in the web environment without installing programs on the computer. It’s a tiny problem that the app doesn’t connect at all on mobile, but it’s the best in the desktop environment.

    Upload a small pdf file and change it to Google Docs format. It could then be stored again in MS Word format or something. However, it really is only possible with pdf files of 2MB or less.

    There is no bandwidth restriction in name. There’s a testimony that it is a block after a lot of writing, but it’s not stipulated by company policy.

    If you use Google Docs web app, you can save documents indefinitely, but if you save them indefinitely, it is the same as once you lose your Internet connection, you are going to sink and work with MS word, right?)

    Google Docs web app, cloud-connected web app, support for editing files utilizing a variety of programs, nonetheless it is still crude in comparison to office programs applied to computers.Could it be obvious?)


    It exerts its strongest power in media viewing. Photo folders? Can be flipped smoothly (Domestic cloud services need a specific amount of buffering time for each photo). However, in the event that you wait a little bit for the dropbox, the photos in a single folder are loaded entirely. While looking at Photo A, Photo B is loaded and scrolling is possible without any blockage. Video? Beyond streaming, you can freely specify before start of playback. It is the best in the world in terms of media reading.

    There are various method of increasing capacity. Camera upload settings, invitation of friends, events at the business level, etc.

    The speed is relatively good. It is a lot faster than the Box and doesn’t bother with Google Drive.

    The file capacity limit which might be uploaded from a free account may be the largest. 300MB.

    The bandwidth of the free account is bigger than that of the Box. It really is updated by 20GB each day. It’s practically infinite unless you are going to share large files.

    The starting capacity may be the smallest. Two gigabytes of dirt.

    Price compared to capacity is the priciest cloud service. Dirty bastards…

    You will find a saying that changes in documents can’t be reflected in real time when working on documents.

    Word documents shouldn’t flip different files like picture documents.

    The dropbox itself cannot be documented.

    There are the most compatible apps in the mobile environment. If you want to work on a document, you can choose the interface you want through the app drive and focus on it leisurely.

    Regarding document files, simple document inquiry is a convenient axis because previews are given. Unlike additional.dropboxes, if there are multiple Word documents in a folder, Word documents may also be flipped on the file or file, as is seen in the photo file.

    File sharing support is fairly good. This box allows anyone who manages or creates a website to share data conveniently with little usage of the net page’s resources. However, the bandwidth of the free account is 10GB monthly, which is quite small.

    Slow. Not paid people.

    Media access is quite disadvantageous. It’s even worse than Google Drive, which says it’s disadvantageous above. It’s easier to just do it on some type of computer than pay attention to it for a test.

    The uploadable file capacity limit is the smallest. 100MB. Free account only.

    In a mobile environment, real-time documentation is rarely supported.

    If you don’t install Boxeditor, the documentation will be written with an extension that may only be written on Box (it works, so it’s better than Dropbox, but it’s less than Google Drive).

    It was recently updated (on 22 February?). Media access is now quite convenient. Especially photo files. However the pace is still a little slow.***


    The writing function is very powerful. Many cloud services offer Web apps. But Skydrive’s is the most similar to the MS office documenting environment we’ve often used. 무료다운사이트 And there’s also the most supported handwriting, though it is four-legged.

    The basic capacity is quite good. 7GB. Well, it’s not that strong a difference.

    It is no exaggeration to state that the interface of mobile apps is the most backward cloud service ever.